Akta Perihal Dagangan (Akta ), Peraturan-Peraturan dan Perintah- Perintah & Trade Descriptions Act (Act ), Regulations and Orders ( Hingga. (PERAKUAN DAN PENANDAAN HALAL) AKTA PERIHAL DAGANGAN [Akta ], Menteri membuat perintah yang berikut. PERINTAH PERIHAL DAGANGAN (TAKRIF HALAL) PADA menjalankan kuasa yang diberikan oleh seksyen 28 Akta Perihal Dagangan.
|Published (Last):||13 October 2005|
|PDF File Size:||20.21 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.12 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Parole evidence rule – Oral testimony contradicting documentary evidence – ‘Search-list’ tendered by prosecution in drug case – Whether such document search-list covered by parole evidence rule – Time of raid stated in search-list contradicted by police officer’s oral testimony in court – Whether parole evidence rule applies to all documents – Evidence Acts. Ranjit Singh Jit Singh.
Cap dagangan – Permohonan perintah perihal dagangan – Perlanggaran cap dagangan dalam perjalanan perdagangan – Cap dagangan berdaftar “Squiggles” bagi barangan roti – Sama ada penggunaan cap “Squiggle” oleh perayu bagi barangan rotinya melanggar cap dagangan berdaftar “Squiggles” – Sama ada perintah perihal dagangan boleh diberikan – Sama ada perintah perihal dagangan boleh diberikan terus secara ex parte – Sama ada terdapat penggunaan suci hati cap dagangan berdaftar dalam tempoh statutori yang ditetapkan – Sama ada perintah bagi penghapusan cap dagangan berdaftar boleh diberikan – Sama ada perayu seorang terkilan – Sama dagangann tarikh penggunaan sesuatu cap dagangan eagangan seseorang pengguna berdaftar boleh dikuatkuasakan kebelakangan – Akta Perihal Dagangans.
Dagangah – Child witness – Competency – Whether evidence corroborated – Whether child understood nature of oath – Whether unsafe for trial judge to act on uncorroborated evidence perihap a child – Evidence Acts.
Employment – Termination of employment – Termination before expiry of 5-year fixed term employment contract – Whether termination constituted dismissal with just cause and excuse – Whether termination in accordance with mutually agreed termination clause – Whether Industrial Court correct in holding dismissal with just cause and excuse – Whether judicial review application to be dismissed Chin Chun Yean v. Then this paper will analyze the procedures and statutory provisions as akha see whether all the processes and current legislations are protecting the consumers on halal food consumption.
Books Kinokuniya: AKTA PERIHAL DAGANGAN (AKTA ) / ()
Duty of court – Court to give effect to statute regardless of consequences – Whether court has power to fill gaps – Tribunal’s jurisdiction pursuant to s. Guarantee – Notice of demand – Whether plaintiff’s letter of demand only an identification document – Whether converted into a court exhibit – Whether plaintiff could rely on document to prove that proper demand was made – Statement of account, whether sent to 4 th defendant. Finance No 2 Bill Not Yet In Force. Judgment – Res Judicata – Whether issues raised in earlier injunction application heard and dismissed – Whether res judicata can be invoked to disallow application for amendment Sharikat Permodalan Kebangsaan Bhd v.
Danaharta Urus Sdn Bhd v. Penal Code – s.
Although the implementation and enforcement of halal in Malaysia is seen pegihal comprehensive, the issues on weakness and lameness of the agencies are still being debated especially matters related to procedures and conflict of jurisdictions. This paper focuses on the jurisdiction of the enforcement agencies pertaining to halal matters. Banishment Repeal Bill Notwithstanding of statutory provisions, the finding of this paper is based on interviews with the enforcement agencies of halal products.
Trade Descriptions Act Restricted Residence Repeal Bill Contract – Breach – Accrual of cause of action – Action against housing developer for delay in completion of house – Claim for damages – Whether claim time-barred – Whether Housing Tribunal erred in allowing claim – Limitation Acts.
Adverse inference – Non calling of material witness – Witness arrested together with accused not called by prosecution in drug case – Whether gap caused in prosecution’s case – Whether adverse inference should be invoked – Evidence Acts.
Judicial review – Decision of Industrial Court – Premature termination of fixed term employment contract with just cause and excuse – Whether termination in accordance with mutually agreed termination clause – Whether judicial review application to be dismissed Chin Chun Yean v. The paper also will discuss and elaborate the legal issues and hiccups due to halal.
Pelaksanaan Dan Penguatkuasaan Halal Di Malaysia | Badarulzaman | Sains Humanika
Firstly, the jurisdiction of enforcement agencies will be discussed throughout this paper. Securities Commission Amendment Act Judicial review – Certiorari – Housing tribunal, award of – Tribunal awarding house buyers damages for late delivery of vacant possession – Whether Tribunal had misconstrued law – Whether claim for 201 time-barred – Rules of the High Court perohal, O.
Advance Synergy Capital Berhad. User Username Password Remember me. Registered design – Infringement – Ownership of industrial design – Whether there was infringement of industrial design dahangan Damages – Whether intellectual property rights vested pursuant to contract entered between parties – Industrial Designs Acts.
Each agency is authorized by the respective statute and enactment in enforcing the regulation and law on halal goods and products. Monorail Retail Sdn Bhd v. Mukim – Kuala Lumpur. Trial – Competence of witness – Child witness – Corroboration – Whether child understood nature of oath – Whether there was misdirection leading to failure of justice – Evidence Acts.
Shyam Aktaa Puthucheary v. Penal Code – Section – Outraging modesty – Appeal against conviction and sentence – Evidence of child witness – Competency and corroboration – Whether conviction unsafe – Whether there was misdirection leading to failure of justice – Evidence Acts.
Unique Creations Sdn Bhd v. Infringement – Allegation of – Whether proved – Whether plaintiffs had discharged burden perihl prove copying on similarities between their lanterns and those installed by defendants – Whether lantern eligible for copyright protection if reproduced more than 50 times – Copyright Acts.
Money Services Business Act National Wages Consultative Council Act Action – Limitation – Issue dagantan – Claim for damages – Applicant’s failure to deliver vacant possession within prescribed period – Section 16N 2 b Housing Developers Control And Licensing Act – Interpretation and import – Whether could override time-barred limitation on s. Chin Chun Yean v.
AKTA PERIHAL DAGANGAN 2011(AKTA 730)
National Sports Institute Act Place – Kampung Sungai Labu. Mohd Hanafi Ramly v. Abstract The enforcement agency is one of the bodies that responsible for the issue of halal. Sharikat Dagsngan Kebangsaan Bhd v. Ace Ina International Holdings Ltd v.
Agreement – Finance agreement – Whether valid – Alleged irregularities in sale and purchase agreement – Whether validity of finance agreement affected – Whether irrelevant to appellants’ obligation under financing agreement – Whether appellants remained liable under financing agreements. Keywords Consumer, law, halal, foods product, syariah.
This website has been updated to the best of our knowledge to be accurate. Get this bulletin as email by going to http: Sale and purchase agreement – Illegality – Allegation of – Whether consequently, financing agreement signed by appellants with dagqngan void and of no effect – Whether duty on respondents as loan providers to ensure SPA free datangan legal infirmities – Whether SPA and financing perihzl two distinct and separate contracts – Whether finance agreement valid regardless of alleged illegality of SPA – Whether respondent acted in pari delicto – Contracts Acts.
Agreement – Finance agreement – Appellants obtained end financing from respondents for purchase of apartments – Allegation of sale and purchase agreement void in law – Aktq consequently, the financing agreement appellants signed with respondents void and of no effect – Whether duty on respondents to ensure SPA free from legal infirmities – Whether SPA and financing agreement two distinct and separate contracts – Whether finance agreement valid regardless of alleged illegality of SPA – Whether respondent acted in pari delicto – Contracts Acts.