Employing analytical tools borrowed from game theory, Carles Boix offers a from the mid-nineteenth century, the study reveals why democracy emerged in. Carles Boix’s ‘Democracy and Redistribution’. In Boix’s account, inequality enters on the ‘cost of toleration’ side of the equation as faced by the. Published by (February ). Carles Boix, Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, xiii + pp.

Author: Kiktilar Douran
Country: Bahamas
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 25 January 2014
Pages: 406
PDF File Size: 15.10 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.69 Mb
ISBN: 133-5-31939-747-6
Downloads: 41072
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tojalar

Democracy and Redistribution – Carles Boix – Google Books

An Introduction Todd Landman No preview available – Moreover, Chapter 4 extends the argument to include the impact of economic growth, trade, and political institutions; Chapter 5 analyzes the interaction between democracy and the size of the public sector; and Chapter 6 examines the threat of rent expropriation vis-? Nathan rated it liked it Mar 09, Moreover, although the regressions on government spending seem fairly robust overall, their R-squared values are often low.

Yet, is this a credible model for understanding political transitions? Trivia About Democracy and Red In the aggregate, this study is definitely a worthwhile read, especially its theoretical section. Cambridge University Press Amazon. Backed by detailed historical redistribbution and extensive statistical analysis f Employing analytical tools borrowed from game theory, Carles Boix offers a complete carlew of political transitions.

Paperback redistrubution, pages.

Preview — Democracy and Redistribution by Carles Boix. However, the empirical testing of the model has both strengths and weaknesses. It is one in which political regimes ultimately depend on the nature of economic assets, their distribution among individuals, and the balance dempcracy power among different social groups.

Democracy and Redistribution

Esther Redistriburion rated it really liked it Dec 14, Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Edwin Jain rated it liked it May 17, Chapter 3, however, does not leave the reader as confident.

Wilkinson Limited preview – Want to Read saving….

Despite these weaknesses, the carless seem to support the underlying model quite well and are certainly persuasive at least. Be the first to ask a question about Democracy and Redistribution.


Democracy and Redistribution

High income equality and capital mobility are characteristics of a democracy, whereas high income inequality and asset specificity for example, the presence of oil provide support for an authoritarian regime. However, some of the choices made in the testing redistrigution these hypotheses can be challenged and decrease the overall value of the empirical findings.

His research interests include corporate political action in the long run, defense economics and the financing of wars, as well as the analysis of government spending in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Ryan Welch rated it it was amazing Jul 14, Charlie Taylor rated it liked it Jan 22, Boix tries to incorporate an element of institutional analysis, democrwcy example, in the section attempting explain the size of general and central government revenue, total spending, nonmilitary spending etc.

Herbert KitscheltSteven I. This is certainly an ambitious endeavor and cannot be verified with such a cursory and selective survey of historical cases for example, Chapter 3.

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. The discussion of racial voting barriers in the U. Matthew Campbell rated it really liked it Jan democrcay, General, International, or Comparative Time Period s: Backed by detailed redistributuon research and extensive statistical analysis from the mid-nineteenth century, the study reveals why democracy emerged in classical Athens.

The introduction of other variables, arising from numerous competing explanations on the size of government, might improve the fit. Ajd for the more recent period, Boix has to rely on proxies for the measurement of asset specificity, thus utilizing agricultural share of GDP land immobilityratio of fuel exports over total exports fixed energy productionyears of schooling human capital rediatribution, and economic concentration as variables. In essence, he argues that political regimes and transitions are the outcome of the preferences and resources of actors in a varles society.

Hugh rated it really liked it Sep 08, New Democdacy and Perspectivesedited by Peter Vikstr? For example, Boix claims that institutions formal or informal do not democrracy in the progress towards democracy if income equality and asset mobility are both high p. However, the use of the democracy variable or constitutional dummies is simply not enough p. The theoretical insights of the book on institutions also leave something to be desired.


Maria rated it liked it Mar 19, Thanks for telling us about the problem. Ike Sharpless rated it liked it Feb 14, Furthermore, it would be interesting to test for certain threshold levels for the various variables, since it is very difficult to conceptualize low versus moderate levels of income inequality or variability between limited versus full democracies. To ask other readers questions about Democracy and Redistributionplease sign up. Backed up by detailed historical work and extensive statistical analysis that goes back to the mid-nineteenth century, this book explains, among many other things, why democracy emerged in classical Athens.

He seems determined to maintain throughout the volume that income is not a relevant measure to explain any aspect of the phenomena under evaluation see e.

Nov 03, Dylan Groves rated it liked it. Cambridge University PressDmocracy 21, – History – pages. Boix argues that the challenge to the ruling elites comes from the lower classes, who wish to change the redistributional equilibrium in the society p. In general, he utilizes panel data regressions extensively, with numerous combinations of dependent usually a binary cares, whether country was or was not a democracy in a given year and independent variables usually various proxies pertaining to income inequality, asset specificity, and political mobilizationand in redistrlbution calculates yearly probabilities of democratic transition for the period Moreover, why measure pre-Second World War income inequality via the distribution of agrarian property and the quality of human capital?

Shuan rated it really liked it Jan 24, I do not have much to criticize in terms of the model itself for example, the game theoretical modeling or the underlying assumptionsexcept when it comes to the institutional aspects of the theoretical framework. For example, how mobile is human capital?