The Passions and the Interests has ratings and 31 reviews. unperspicacious said: Hirschman is a beast. I was hoping to find a few nuggets on the phil. In this volume, Albert Hirschman reconstructs the intellectual climate of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries to illuminate the intricate ideological trans.. . In this volume, Albert Hirschman reconstructs the intellectualclimate of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries to illuminatethe intricate ideological transfo .
|Published (Last):||23 October 2006|
|PDF File Size:||2.87 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.53 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Follow the Author
However, it remains helpful in understanding the context in which Adam Smith and others wrote in favor of what would become capitalism, and for today of some of capitalism’s benefits at least for those who get money.
A great meditation on the evolution of the philosophical ideas that gave birth to capitalism.
Thanks for telling us about the problem. This book hirscchman required reading for a class. Buy the selected items together This item: He was not necessarily trying to convince me, his reader, of any one thing, but rather to open my thr to the train of past arguments and to make me see that it is important to educate myself in past rhetoric before attempting my own modern rhetoric. Nov 23, Said Abuzeineh rated it really liked it.
Understanding Society: Hirschman on the passions
Aug 24, Matt rated it really liked it Shelves: Of course, before the dawn of capitalism, the pursuit of economic interests was considered one of the worst passions; avarice was always a foe of hirscmhan Platonic conception of Reason and the Christian view of the Truth.
It is rare to pick up a book for academic research and find it a pleasure to read, interdsts this was certainly the case with Hirschman’s delightful prose. Mar 24, Roger B rated it really liked it Shelves: It also raises the issue that as capital is threaten, so too may be liberty, as those with capital prefer law and order over freedom.
Among the insights presented here is the ironical finding that capitalism was originally supposed to accomplish exactly what was soon interets as its worst feature: Hirschman here offers a new interpretation for the rise of capitalism, one that emphasizes the continuities between old and new, in contrast to the assumption of a sharp break that is a common feature of both Marxian and Weberian thinking.
Amazon Renewed Refurbished products with a warranty. Two eighteen century thinkers at the center of this argument are Montesquieu and Sir James Steuart.
It is worth knowing more than we do about where hirschmam ideas originated and why expectations didn’t play out as intended. Ad more Read less. Would highly recommend to anyone looking for a jaunt through the history of philosophizing on the topic of capitalism, or simply a trip through any episode of intellectual history in general. You can say that this book is Hirschmann’s analysis of Machiavelli.
The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triumph
One person found this helpful. Top Reviews Most recent Top Reviews. His insights and especially his de-demonizing of Machiavelli, give hope for a world thd it’s people who deserve better than the current models be they capitalist, socialist or communist.
See all 8 reviews. One needn’t have a thorough background in Western political philosophy to make sense of it, but if your response is anything like mine, you will want to make haste to the nearest library to delve into the theory you don’t know.
In this way, the author’s conclusion, that those that advocated for capitalism could not have fathomed the capitalists excesses at the 19th and 20th century seems pat and condescending.
Alas, however, by the time Adam Smith writes his psssions, he had united interests and passions again; under the influence of the passions, people’s interests were no longer satisfied with modest results–instead of being socially discouraged, avarice become an acceptable, indeed worthy, goal. I got into Hirschman recently,and I’m in a long-term read of a book about his fascinating life Worldly Philosopher,lauded by Malcolm Gladwellbut I’m also reading a couple of his books along the way, including “Crossing Boundaries” a delicious hors d’oeuvre of a bookand this one, which is short at pages, but literally rewrites the historical underpinnings of the development of capitalism.
Want to Read saving…. Of course, before the dawn of capitalism, the pursuit of economic interests intfrests considered one of the worst passions; avarice is a foe of the Platonic conception of Reason and the Christian view of the Truth.
The former proposes that a laissez-faire economy softens and refines ans passionate and violent excesses of man: The amount of research he has done for this thin volume is stunning, and he weaves seamlessly and clearly through the work thinkers as varied as Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Mandeville, Montesquieu, Steuart, Smith, Millar, Marx, Toqueville and many others.
English Choose a language for shopping. Open Preview See a Problem? Aug 06, Jeff rated it really liked it.
Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triumph is an essay as insightful and thought-provoking as it is elegant. Hirschman here of In this volume, Albert Hirschman reconstructs the intellectual climate of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries to illuminate the intricate ideological transformation that occurred, wherein the pursuit of material interests –so long condemned as the deadly sin of avarice –was assigned the role of containing the unruly and destructive interestx of man.
Albert O. Hirschman’s The Passions and the Interests | Wheat from the Chaff Blog –
The Passions and the Interests: Nevertheless, with the decline of feudalism and the rise of absolutist monarchies, the great concern of thinkers like Hobbes was the rising power of the state and the passions that led monarchs into ruinous external and civil interdsts.
Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1. I Enjoyed Hirschman’s analysis, which, however, is quite narrow in its scope and is elucidated very early. By showing that the same arguments about the relative strengths of the passions and the interests were central to early writers in capitalism’s history as modern writers, we should probably be less inclined toward the view that “capitalism changes everything” and normative political economy should start from a blank slate.